![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||
|
I have tried both of these types for advertising my sites.Is one better than the other to get traffic?
|
|
|
|
||
|
#2
|
||
|
I'd personly say Banner, because it can catch the user's eye better than text ads
|
|
|
|
||
|
#3
|
||
|
yea,banners,if done right will catch a persons eye maybe faster than text.I have read where they say that people are now starting ignore banners
|
|
|
|
||
|
#4
|
||
|
I'd go with banners as well, but that's not to say text links won't be helpful as well. A text link on a big site will get good exposure plus help with your PR.
|
|
|
|
||
|
#5
|
||
|
As we know already Picture is worth than thousand words, banner will always catch more visitors than text.
|
|
|
|
||
|
#6
|
|||
|
Quote:
That's only if the link is a direct link and doesn't have sort of nofollow/redirection. Many sites will sell text advertising, but use their own ad management system so the "text links" don't end being real links at all. |
||
|
|
|||
|
#7
|
||
|
I would have to say banners aswell. As long as it stands out. I think textlinks are pretty effective too though if you have an appealing description text.
I have noticed though that I have started ignoring banners, not deliberately though ![]() |
|
|
|
||
|
#8
|
||
|
I would say that both can be effective. I've seen with adsense that more people tend to click on the banner and image-type ads, moreso than the text ads, though using one type of advertising and completely ignoring the other isn't a wise decision. I think that using both would be smarter than using one or the other.
|
|
|
|
||
|
#9
|
||
|
An image says more than 1000 words!
![]() |
|
|
|
||
|
#10
|
||
|
To get more traffic, banner is a really good option
__________________
TRIBALHOST.NET - Realiable and Cheap Shoutcast Hosting
50 slots $10 dollars month 100 slots $20 dollars month |
|
|
|
||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|