VPS or Dedicated hosting

Does anyone prefer VPS/Dedicated Hosting? I'm asking because a few of my sites use heavy CPU Resources which cause my host to suspend my accounts. Should I go dedicated or VPS?

Dedicated is better.. of course

__________________

you should get dedicated if you need more CPU, but usually VPS that costs about $50/month is better than dedicated server that costs $99/month, you will get better quality, but less resources.

Dedicated is the best option is you have money to afford that, in other case you have to go to a reliable VPS provider

__________________

Post your requirements in terms of bandwidth and disk space, it'll be easier to answer your question.

Start with a VPS, when your site grows, go to a Dedicated Server.

__________________

A lot of VPS providers still limit you in terms of CPU...which sort of defeats the purpose of a VPS.

Anyone who wants a recommendation for a VPS provider that doesn't shut you down for using too much CPU, please contact me.

__________________
The Hosting Team
cPanel Hosting. Instant activation. Recurring affiliate commissions.
"That's what the web is for"
www.thehostingteam.com

It entirely depends on how much resources you use, you need the figures in order to make a good decision.

Also, keep in mind that VPS plans often, though not always, come with managed service (note also that various providers include different components in their managed services packages). If you do not want to maintain a server, whether viritual or dedicated, managed services are a good thing to keep your server healthy and secure.

For that matter, you can also buy managed services for a dedicated server, whether from the host or from a third party management company.

__________________
The Hosting Team
cPanel Hosting. Instant activation. Recurring affiliate commissions.
"That's what the web is for"
www.thehostingteam.com

If you got the kind of money that you need for Dedicated, then ofcourse it should be Dedicated. If you're in a budget, then VPS.