Web 2.0 or Article Submission?

[Neo_5678]

Web 2.0 or Article Submission, Which one is batter for SEO?

[hoangrapsoul]

Hi Neo
Its web 2.0 submission will be more effective compared to article submission because most of the reputable article submission sites are closed or not accepting content anymore.

[WebDevNow]

Hi Neo
Its web 2.0 submission will be more effective compared to article submission because most of the reputable article submission sites are closed or not accepting content anymore.

TOTALLY agree with you.
Guest posting and article submissions are becoming harder nowadays.
I think Web 2.0 submission will do a great job but only if done right..

[tourism123]

web 2.0 submission and article submission Both are important for SEO. Article submission is harder but it is the efficient way to get high traffic.

[hariandro]

Article or web 2.0 both will give you do follow links but these both methods need unique content , without that these will be not effective and unique content is needed for both blog 2.0 and article posting ..

[RH-Calvin]

Both are equally important and helps to market your content. They help to build your website strength and ranking in search engines and also generate good traffic.

[Neo_5678]

Thank you guys... thank you so much for giving such a useful suggestion.
actually i was also search about it and collect some information which I wanted to share with with you guys.

Web 2.0 accept our all content and give us "do follow" links and in other hand Article submission provide "no follow" links but its give us traffic and click on our keywords.

So I thing if we need quality backlinks then we have to do web 2.0
but if we need hits on our targeted keyword or traffic on website then we do Article submission.


Please tell me if I am right...

[chawong]

Both Web 2.0 and Article Submissions are effective Off-Page SEO techniques but Web 2.0 is way more effective for SEO purpose.

[abdullah45]

Web 2.0 is better then Article submission.

[onlinepaystub]

Thank you guys... thank you so much for giving such a useful suggestion.
actually i was also search about it and collect some information which I wanted to share with with you guys.

Web 2.0 accept our all content and give us "do follow" links and in other hand Article submission provide "no follow" links but its give us traffic and click on our keywords.

So I thing if we need quality backlinks then we have to do web 2.0
but if we need hits on our targeted keyword or traffic on website then we do Article submission.


Please tell me if I am right...

Ye you are right. As per my opinion, I feel Web 2.0 is better than article because depending on your niche, you might not get proper category for your service and there are very few article submission sites which are actually good with high DA, PA and accept your articles. For such sites, you need one of your best articles with least surety that it will get accepted. This is a work of quite a hassle with no guarantee of fruitful results. So, inputting same amount of efforts in web 2.0 will surely yield better results.