VPS or Dedicated hosting

[ThatMichaelKid]

The better choice is definitely Dedicated. However, if you can't afford it and/or need to start on some form of platform then you can use a VPS server. You should go with VPS to begin with.

[vibesh]

dedicated hosting is always best rather than vps hosting.

[jorgewright825]

As what is the usual process goes, you must always have to begin with a VPS and then gradually proceed to your chosen server. Through this VPS you can guarantee on sharing with other CPU.

[warek44]

Free website hosts are good for many things, but for hosting a business website, you cannot beat professional paid web hosting for reliability, service, and support

[Host Deal]

Does anyone prefer VPS/Dedicated Hosting? I'm asking because a few of my sites use heavy CPU Resources which cause my host to suspend my accounts. Should I go dedicated or VPS?

If you have a site with heavy CPU resource, I think VPS is the best alternative for you. In this VPS you can maximize your hosting without worry about stability.

[webguru]

Dedicated Hosting offers more privacy over VPS or shared hosting, The owner of dedicated server has the full control over the server(s) and also have the choice of operating system, hardware etc. Server administration is usually provided by the hosting provider company. He/she doesn't need to share bandwidth, web space or any features with other website.

[Redsw]

It depends on your demands and website load

[swammy0040]

I think you have to go with dedicated server were you get all think unlimited so their no issue of high CPU usage

[markorton]

VPS is better than Dedicated

VPS server hosting could be the right choice of companies looking for enhanced use of resources and some degree of exclusivity
VPS is cheaper than Dedicated server, VPS shares the resources but dedicated server totally belongs to single client.
VPS server are easy to afford and maintain.
It is great choice for small and medium enterprises