Would you pay more for more features

[KCareConnections]

Would you pay a higher amount for hosting services if you received more features (even if those features were not anything you really needed) or would you rather pay more for a hosting package offering you more bandwidth and disk space (even if less other features and applicaitons)?

[numskull]

I do not see necessity in getting extra features paid. There are companies, like a2hosting.com which are offering long range of the included features with their hosting plans which are reasonable considering space and bandwidth metrics. And I believe they are not alone.

[KCareConnections]

I only like to pay for features and applications that I truly need. It is just a bonus if I receive more applications for a lower fee each month.

[thewebhostingdir]

The important thing is hidden cost. You should get what you are actual paying. Always consider that your hosts servers are configured with maximum performance and security.

[john06]

It will all depend on the traffic and the size of my website, then I would pay more for bandwidth and disk space or better yet, I'll just find a web hosting that would cater for my needs.

[alanwalters]

When choosing a web hosting,i think most people will write down on a sheet of paper the requirement you are looking for in a web hosting provider.Of course the budget is include,to pay extra money for the features you needn't ,waste money.

[sparkliecandy]

I dont want to pay more than I can really afford. That is a rule. We can opt for the better by having quality content in our sites. minus the expense.

[hostcolor]

Sure. If I was a customer I'd be willing to pay for quality. But all depends of the websites and projects anyone is looking for host.

[DH - Tristan Perry]

It depends on the customer, and if they'd actively use those other features.

As consumers we sometimes want as many features as possible, but if we won't really use them, there's little point in paying for them IMO.

[HostLeet]

Yes, I would pay more money on hosting for more features. But, if I don't need the so called features, I would not. Why get something you don't need?

[thewebhostingdir]

Yes you are correct. You should pay for that features which you are using. It is a common fundamental that you pay for what you are using.

[Natcoweb.com]

I wish I could hear more of clients' opinions rather than hosting providers' as these may really differ.
For a hosting provider adding features and charging for them is a sure way to increase the revenue without increasing the clientbase.