Windows or Linux server?

[modric]

You wil need WINDOWS hosting server for running:
-ASP/ASP.NET
-MS access
-MS SQL

UNIX (LINUX) servers are recomended for:
-Ruby on rails
-CGI/PERL
-Postgres databases

I'm interested is UNIX really needed for CGI/PERL? Can't it run on Windows?
Anyway, Unix hosting is cheap...

[AHA7]

Re: Windows or Linux server?

I'd prefer linux hosting over windows hosting for the following simple reasons:

- Cheaper
- More reliable
- More secure

[loon]

Re: Windows or Linux server?

I used to think the same way like you but not anymore after reading this article:

One of the most confusing decisions someone new to web hosting will have to make is which platform their server should be on. There are a number of different choices out there but the main two are Linux and Windows web servers. There are also a lot of sources of information about hosting, but the majority of them are tainted by the author's biased personal opinion unfortunately confusing the issue. Having just put in some solid hours researching the topic I have come to the conclusion that in general it quite probably does not matter which server you use. For the majority of people it will be far more important to choose a really good web host than to worry about the server-type that they implement.

Microsoft developed and owns the Windows operating system. Linux is open source and generally free. This means it can often be more expensive to set up and run a Windows server. However, this fact doesn't really affect you unless you are actually setting up a server for yourself and if you're reading this article then I'm guessing that it's safe to assume you're not. This article is going to offer information for those trying to decide which hosting company to go with. The cost involved in running a server does not affect the cost of a web-hosting package as much as you may think. Despite the general opinion that Windows servers are more expensive to run, buying a Windows hosting package can often turn out to be just as cheap or even cheaper than an equivalent Linux hosting package.

Some people naturally assume that because their PC runs Windows they need to buy a Windows hosting package. This isn't true. Access to your web account will most likely be through FTP or a control panel and both servers support these methods. The main difference is that some of the FTP commands are slightly different between Linux and Windows and some FTP programs will be designed with one or the other in mind. This means you may occasionally find that when you try and get your FTP program to do something it returns an error message, but it won't happen very often.

Your choice of server platforms should be dictated by the use to which you intend to put it. The majority of web features run fine on both platforms including PHP, mySQL, POP3 etc. If you intend to create your site using ASP, FrontPage, the .NET environment, Windows Streaming Media, Access, MSSQL, or any of the other Microsoft proprietary technologies then you probably need to use a Windows host. There is limited support for a number of these technologies in Linux, but they can be expensive and are usually lacking in features. It is probably worth considering the fact that if you use server specific technologies and then change hosts you'll have a much harder time of it than if you use technologies that can be run on any system. Having it run generic technologies removes the need to focus on specifics and allows you to focus on the quality of service itself.

The reliability and stability of the different platforms have been the topic of many long arguments. The main reason that Windows is seen as being insecure is that it is the most widely used operating system for home PC's. People spend more time looking for flaws in the most common system. With Linux being the most common server type, it has a surprising number of successful hack attempts made on it. In the end the security of both platforms comes down to the competency of the system administrators. If you are security minded then you'll do better to make sure that the hosting company is reputable and highly skilled than to worry about the server they use.

In terms of performance there's not a huge difference between the two servers. Linux reportedly performs faster because Windows (as usual) attempts to offer an 'all in one' package instead of the extendable Linux implementation. You'll generally not notice a difference but if performance is of utmost importance to you then maybe this will influence your decision.

I've come to the conclusion that unless you are specifically using features that are unique to one platform or another your time will be much better spent looking for a really good quality host than a really good quality server. Developers are constantly improving both Linux and Windows so they should be fairly close in terms of features, security, and reliability for a long time. It's the people implementing them that you should be basing your decision on.

Hope this help

[d3v]

Re: Windows or Linux server?

Linux/unix hosting is cheaper and thats a fact. Just look at the prices at most webhosts and you'll see the difference. To the OP, the features that you require can be installed on both windows and linux.

[loon]

Re: Windows or Linux server?

Yes i do agree linux is cheaper... i m just saying most of people will emphasize on a quality host rather than what platform to use

[0lgi]

Re: Windows or Linux server?

Well i have been using an linux server for my counter strike game and everything seemed really great !

[PsychoDude]

Re: Windows or Linux server?

I think it completely depends on what the server shall be used for, although in most cases using a linux server will be most stable for now. Seeing as to how windows servers are still commonly affected by global windows threats as we've seen in the past. Although with professional hosting companies this will not be too noticable for the client, there you do have to keep in mind though again that you pay extra for the fact that it runs windows.

Depending on the type of this hosting, the price you pay extra can be pretty high.

[blackwizard]

Re: Windows or Linux server?

Well, This completely depends on what kind of site we need to host.

For my game arcade, Ive been using Linux! And not an error has popped up! But I heard
from one of my frnz.. that Windows Server is not that a stable like Linux! But most of the Official or Pro. Hosting companies have been using only, Linux..

Here is one of the Good host which hosts through Linux. :

www.complexity-hosting.com

And their Catalog is www.complexity-hosting.com/catalog

[surfnearnzone]

Re: Windows or Linux server?

For me it is always windows. I have been using it all my life and also i am skilled to use only those scripting languages which work with windows. So for me windows. And who says windows platform is not stable. I never had a problem using them.

[infinitomagazine]

Re: Windows or Linux server?

I will preffer linux because I dont know about windows hosting
but i know linux is cheaper than windows hosting

[sb225]

Re: Windows or Linux server?

I prefer linux hosting because it more secure and have DDos protect
windows cant provide to all scripts i believe but i always use linux host only

[Cheapquality]

Re: Windows or Linux server?

I also give preference to linux hosting, Its good, now a days i check alot of sites which are providing windows hosting as very cheap price but really i like linux hosting, its secure ,fast and have great uptime.

[vlad230]

Re: Windows or Linux server?

I agree with aha7 ...Linux hosting is more cheaper and more reliable.

[wmcode]

Re: Windows or Linux server?

on linux you can to run ASP/ASP.NET
by all the ways linux server is better option

[loon]

Re: Windows or Linux server?

on linux you can to run ASP/ASP.NET
by all the ways linux server is better option

windows can run ASP/ASP.net also...

microsoft also came out with a new thing we call it MSSQL express... it is free and it has most of the functions in MSSQL server