Which web hosting is better ..?

[pihu147741]

Hello friends,

Please tell me Which web hosting is better ..? Shared or VPS hosting..?

[RH-Calvin]

VPS hosting is much more preferred compared to shared hosting, as the former offers private hosting and is more safe and secure. Unlike shared hosting, you don't need to share your hosting space and bandwidth with other clients in VPS hosting.

[Monkeyking]

Yes I agree. VPS is much more secure and flexible compared to shared hosting. You can find stable hosting solution both VPS and shared hosting from 4goodhosting.com. They offered advanced hosting solution at reasonable deals. I've been with this host and so far I haven't had any problems. No downtime. I am very satisfied. Just give them a try.

[FTP]

You will get what you pay for if you are going to deal with glowhost.com web host. Good communication and customer service is key to a great web-host, and it has these qualities in spades. Many webmasters appreciate them for any web hosting services.

[nldisplays]

At iPage, we have a team of folks who think about nothing but the customer experience and our user interfaces. Every month, we launch something to make it easier for you to use our services.

[romitamukharji1990]

VPS hosting is better then Shared. It is secured

[MilesGeek]

Selecting between shared hosting and VPS hosting depends on the needs of the website. If fewer amount of resources are required for the website, then one can start with a shared hosting package and upgrade the hosting account at a later point of time. Both, shared hosting and VPS hosting are great web hosting platforms to work with.

[farhandiesel]

Vps hosting will be good as compared tp shared hosting were you get own space and your data will be not shared with others

[Steven&son]

Since VPS has had much better uptime, is much faster, and gives you much more freedom, since you can install any panel you want for example.
You can rely on hostingsource.com - many of my clients are happy running their web sites with them.
VPS hosting - 50% off the price special.

[freidariviere]

Well, I think you need to compare buying any hosting package from any website hosting provider

[TheRACK]

If your looking for exact specs dedicated just to you as you have high and low peaks then yes VPS is a good idea, but in otherwords if you just need your site online shared is a good option as well if they dont oversell. Shared hosting is actually preferred for most business's these day's you get more for your money, cheap monthlys and with low domains on each server you usually dont have to fight for resource's you may even get more then a VPS. I have four 32GB server's I have 10 people on each no more then 25 domains only one of them on average is high traffic, theres a abundance of resource's available for them to use without having to upgrade or worry about latency issues.

PS: Dedicated server's are pretty well priced these day's. I sell them routinely for $28-$60 a month. Maybe check into a dedicated server, thats the biggest savings

[Klaster]

Good info, thanks for sharing it with us.

[raianju]

Shared hosting is better. Its easily access.

[jayakumari]

shared hosting is good.

[Leigh]

Compared to a shared hosting service, a VPS (Virtual Private Server) is a technically superior solution in almost every single way. Technically, VPS servers are actually still “shared” environments (in as much as there will still be more than one user running on the same physical machine) but the technology used to assign resources and keep users separate is much more sophisticated.